[Stone Mountain]

Maybe in your world, but not mine. I have no problem associating with a person that gambles recreationally. I would never keep company with a drugger or a hooker.

I see you are missing the point. The point is not whether or not you would hang out with them. The point is that we are discussing the reasons you are using as justification to do so. I was pointing out that the same arguments can be used for those different vices. Whether or not you agree that the vices are morally equivalent is irrelevent to that point.

You high and mightys are a hoot.

So right after you mention that you are too high and mighty to hang out with druggers and hookers, how is it you accuse me of being high and mighty? Incidentally, I can think of at least one person that many people (maybe even you) consider a role model that used to hang out with hookers...

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Whether or not you agree that the vices are morally equivalent is irrelevent to that point.

Wrong premise. You begin by calling it a vice. I disagree.

Is vacationing a vice? Is going to the movies a vice? Is buying a newer and better vehicle before necessary a vice?

You know the answer is "no". All of the above are choices people make for pleasure and it takes money.

Unless a person is depriving his/her family or neglecting responsibilities, gambling is no different than any other form of entertainment.