To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Weak argument.......apples and oranges
Not in this case. The justification for Bennett's gambling is that he isn't causing harm to others. This same justification can be used for other vices that he rails against. Same argument, different vices.
To: Stone Mountain
This same justification can be used for other vices that he rails against. Same argument, different vices. Maybe in your world, but not mine.
I have no problem associating with a person that gambles recreationally. I would never keep company with a drugger or a hooker.
You high and mightys are a hoot.
309 posted on
05/02/2003 4:17:14 PM PDT by
Southflanknorthpawsis
(Trying hard to make it to the top spot on Tagbad Todd's "Top Ten List" -Taggie's a liar)
To: Stone Mountain
The justification for Bennett's gambling is that he isn't causing harm to others.Good point.
So, who do you like in the Kentucky Derby tomorrow?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson