Skip to comments.
The Man of Virtues Has a Vice (Bill Bennett gambles)
Newsweek ^
| 1/2/03
| Jonathan Alter and Joshua Green
Posted on 05/02/2003 1:27:57 PM PDT by Callahan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 421-433 next last
To: bedolido
if it's his money, who gives a damn.....he's got enough of it...
81
posted on
05/02/2003 2:05:12 PM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: Callahan
I hope he gets some help...how sick.
Let's see. He didn't talk about the demon of alcohol either, did he?
He's been getting on my nerves the last couple of years. Pompous and arogant.
82
posted on
05/02/2003 2:05:55 PM PDT
by
meema
To: Mr. Mojo
You got a point there.
To: TC Rider
Whoever leaked this will probably never work in a casino again. And if this happened 25 years ago (or before), the guy's carcass would either be sitting on the bottom of Lake Tahoe with a 500 lb weight attached to his ankles or out roasting in the middle of the Nevada desert somewhere.
84
posted on
05/02/2003 2:06:39 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: toothseaquer
Trying to achieve money by chance is a very immoral activity. Can you provide some basis for this claim, other than your own personal belief system? If your position is founded in a religious perspective, can you provide a scriptural reference? As I said to another person, personal morality is just that - personal. Condemning another person for failiing to live up to your personal moral code is wrong.
To: Shermy
*rolling eyes*
I'm sorry, but I can't respect someone who won't try the tables at least once.
I'm really disappointed in him. I thought he'd at least be a black-jack player.
I can't say that I'll think of him in the same way again.
If you tell me he drinks Coronas while he gambles, I will be crushed.
To: Foamfollower
shame on me....I missed the name....if I had seen Alter I wouldn't have even read further
87
posted on
05/02/2003 2:09:26 PM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: mabelkitty
I thought gambling was legal. That's not the point. Bennett is a moralist. Bennett should be the first one to understand the devastation that gambling can inflict on the 'innocent' family members who suffer because of the gambler's addiction. It's curious that alcohol is legal in every state, but gambling is not, but yet people on this board are trying to say that gambling isn't immoral or that it doesn't have negative consequences on society, and indeed, that moralists should have no qualms about spending their free time in an institution that bankrupts and destroys families.
Oh, the lengths people will go, to excuse one of their own...
88
posted on
05/02/2003 2:09:52 PM PDT
by
zoyd
To: toothseaquer
Gambling is not immoral....destroying your life and your family's life is immoral
89
posted on
05/02/2003 2:10:24 PM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: BrooklynGOP
Know what's fun www.simslots.com
Also, Las Vegas Adviser ROCKS!
To: Mr. Mojo
I could care less if he gambles. What I object to is his telling me that smoking a joint in the privacy of my own home or having sex before marriage is somehow "immoral." The hypocrisy reeks off that schmuck. Smoking pot is illegal. Gambling is not, at least in Atlantic City and Vegas.
Premarital sex is condemned by all three of the major religions, and there are scriptural references to back it up. So even if you disagree, you can hardly accuse Bennett of trying to impose his personal moral code on anyone by saying that premarital sex is immoral.
To: truthandlife
I know he makes a lot of money but throwing your money away in Las Vegas isn't the smartest thing in the world. Your statement has merit if he always loses money. There is also the chance he wins on occasion too. I've seen a number of people at the blackjack tables with piles of chips in front of them, and I watched them make those piles.
Yes its a game of chance, but skill and intelligence does factor into the equation as well.
Geez, all this talk about Bennet playing video poker and slots being imoral, and we just got done cheering a man playing the highest stakes poker in the world:
W - against the UN, France, Germany, Russia, & of course So-Damn-Insane.
The next round has other players lining up for the challenge: Syria, Iran, and N. Korea.
In politics; gambling is a fact of life, so what if a player wants to play for a little less statkes, such as money.
To: toothseaquer
Read one of his books first.
To: zoyd
Being a "high roller" in Vegas just means that you pay way too much money for a nice hotel room and a little VIP treatment. I'd love to see some casino employees stand up and say "Hey, this guy put my kids through college." I read some poster on DU actually sticking up for Bill. He said he heard Bennett was a big tipper who was well like by the casino employees for his overall courtesy as a guest.
94
posted on
05/02/2003 2:11:41 PM PDT
by
Callahan
To: The Wizard
I don't see what the big deal is.
So Bennett is at a casino. Big deal. He ought to go to games where he has a better chance, though. If I hit Vegas, I'd avoid the slots and the video poker machines.
95
posted on
05/02/2003 2:11:51 PM PDT
by
hchutch
(America came, America saw, America liberated; as for those who hate us, Oderint dum Metuant)
To: BrooklynGOP
"...Who cares? It's *his* money..."
Exacto Mundo! If one has the extra buck$ to do so...more power to'em. As Clint Eastwood once said: "A man gott'a know his limitations"...as to the "notion" that gambling is "evil" ..I say, "Bravo Sierra"...(not directed toward you).
Vegas, New Orleans and several cruise ship vacations have always been profitable. Sometimes one wins...other times one loses...but I'm still in the black.
Mustang sends from "Malpaso" News.
96
posted on
05/02/2003 2:12:02 PM PDT
by
Mustang
(Evil Thrives When Good People Do Nothing!)
To: Callahan
Pretty decent man has a serious personal problem. Just make's me sad. Hope he recognizes his problem and gets help.
97
posted on
05/02/2003 2:13:02 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: Callahan
$ 8 million is a lot of money, any way I count it.
98
posted on
05/02/2003 2:13:09 PM PDT
by
zoyd
To: Porterville
If he is going to bring up morality, judging others, he better be ready to get his own, especially if he is unable to control his appetites. Can you cite evidence that he can't control his appetites? The article says pretty plainly that he doesn't gamble "the milk money", meaning he doesn't gamble so much that he cannot provide for his family.
To: Lord_Baltar
That's my whole point. This hit piece is a throwback to the Clinton years and, even worse, the Clinton style of political "discourse" -- long on sophomoric debate stunts, gamesmanship, and ad hominem, but short on serious rational discussion of political issues. My view is that the country became much more serious about politics after 9/11, with only one of the many results being the Republican victories in the last election.
100
posted on
05/02/2003 2:14:12 PM PDT
by
kesg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 421-433 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson