To: GrandMoM
The NOW position will be spelled out in its friend of the court brief: The "father" chose to abort the late term fetus (prematurely named Connor). The right to abortion is the paramount right. Therefore, in this instance, the "father's" intent outweighs the intent of the mother (who had chosen to take the fetus to term). The "father", using self help, took matters into his own hands. The fact that the mother died was unfortunate (a form of collateral damage, so to speak). Therefore, the court should dismiss all charges against the "father" as he was merely exercising his Supreme Court granted right to the abortion, and as the death of the mother occurred during the procedure, it must be viewed as accidental.
Furthermore, NOW will be running new abortion ads this summer with Scott Peterson as its man of the year.
5 posted on
04/30/2003 8:11:04 AM PDT by
Pharlap
To: Pharlap
In as much as you reveal the insane, twisted, evil "logic" of N.O.W. you also reveal the perverion of the Supreme Court itself, which decreed in Roe v Wade that only licensed physicians can kill pre-natal children with impunity.
Cordially,
6 posted on
04/30/2003 8:21:20 AM PDT by
Diamond
To: Pharlap
I'm betting that NOW is going to directly or indirectly represent Scott in court...when they spoke up against the double homicide charge there was a severe backlash...so they will try to covertly make sure the double homicide doesn't stick.
7 posted on
04/30/2003 8:24:14 AM PDT by
belle99
To: Pharlap
I support Male abortions.. but not to that extent...
8 posted on
04/30/2003 8:39:09 AM PDT by
Grymskull
(A supporter of the VRWC and the Male Abortion..)
To: Pharlap; Registered
Furthermore, NOW will be running new abortion ads this summer with Scott Peterson as its man of the year.Sounds like a job for Registered! Please, Registered!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson