Quote "You ought to retitle the article as "ex con stupidly in possession of weapon gets the sentence he deserves"."
He DESERVES???? You have to be kidding right? You forgot your sarcasm /
Deserves.
He is a two time loser - and I've never met a con that didn't know he couldn't possess any firearms without drawing Federal time.
In other words, his ignorance of the law is bogus.
He knew.