Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW
Why bother having a judge, when all you need is a Judge-O-matic?
4 posted on 04/30/2003 5:49:34 AM PDT by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: guitfiddlist
That will be next, right after they do away with juries.

L

5 posted on 04/30/2003 5:50:42 AM PDT by Lurker ("One man of reason and goodwill is worth more, actually and potentially, than a million fools" AR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: guitfiddlist
Mandatory sentences are needed so bleeding-heart judges don't go soft on the criminal element. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
25 posted on 04/30/2003 6:08:46 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: guitfiddlist
Judicial Discretion is a two-edged sword but generally better than the idiotic "Let's prove how tough we are on crime by imprisoning more people than any Western 'democracy'" mandatory sentencing guidelines.
42 posted on 04/30/2003 6:22:28 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson