Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
You're supporting the same judicial activism that gave us Roe v Wade. This privacy stuff ISN'T IN THE CONSTITUTION!!! So how are these laws unconstitutional? One might argue whether or not they should be adopted, but that is up to legislators.

There is no constitutional right to gay sex, and your support for such a right is NOT conservative, it is against the constitution which puts you right there with Hillary and all the other commies.

203 posted on 04/23/2003 3:16:41 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Hold muh gun and watch this!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ
We're clear now right? The government CAN outlaw masturbation, if they want? How about oral / breast contact? Can they outlaw that? What about toesucking? Can the government outlaw that?

Is there anything not specifically mentioned in the Constitution that you believe the government can't prohibit?

You're calling me a commie? I've never heard any theory that turned the Constitution into a tool of oppression as much as the way you read it.

204 posted on 04/23/2003 3:23:42 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

To: JohnnyZ
Striking down the Texas law doesn't require a thimble full of judicial activism. It is an EPC violation, plain and simple. Tell me how its not. Go ahead. Articulate a legal argument.


205 posted on 04/23/2003 3:26:29 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson