Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2004 Presidential Candidate Calls for Santorum to Resign Senate Post
Guardian Unlimited UK ^ | April 23, 2003 | wire report

Posted on 04/23/2003 11:45:44 AM PDT by ewing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last
To: mabelkitty
Who are you to say anything about who I am? You know nothing. And if what you say on this board is any indication, your repeated claims to be a Christian are empty.
161 posted on 04/23/2003 2:03:26 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ewing
It's obviously all right for high-ranking Democrats to commit rape, masturbate interns with cigars, lie, stick their tongues in unimaginable places, belong to hate organizations and cheat on their wives and drown their dates.

But to stand for the Constitution is a crime in the eyes of the left-wing clymers in Congress and the media.

162 posted on 04/23/2003 2:04:54 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #163 Removed by Moderator

To: lugsoul
Au contraire.

I know what the Bible says about homosexuality.

The fact that I haven't used any slurs or condemned them to hell is testament to that fact. I can differentiate between sins and people.

You cannot be a Christian and condone the act of homosexuality as outlined in the Bible.

Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining.

164 posted on 04/23/2003 2:08:46 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
JohnnyZ, you clearly don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about.

My state, Georgia, has a constitutional right to privacy under the STATE constitution. If you don't believe me, ask the Georgia Supreme Court.

If you don't have anything accurate to say, why don't you just tell us you are pulling it out of your butt ( I guess it is okay with you to pull stuff out of your butt, as long as you aren't putting stuff in there. )

165 posted on 04/23/2003 2:10:00 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
That's only about the Democrats you've heard about.

I've heard some things that would make your hair curl.

Don't private message me, because I ain't tellin'.
166 posted on 04/23/2003 2:10:19 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
There is a world of difference between condoning an act and believing that the government has the right and the power to regulate it.

You should think before you speak.

167 posted on 04/23/2003 2:11:23 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
My state, Georgia, has a constitutional right to privacy under the STATE constitution.

So prostitution is legal?

168 posted on 04/23/2003 2:12:35 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (What two adults do in the privacy of their home IS my business. I'm the one holding the camera!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Our government and our rights would not exist without God.

You keep trying to dance around that fact and you look foolish doing it.

169 posted on 04/23/2003 2:15:03 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
FYI, I am heterosexual, in a happy and stable marriage with children.

REALLY? This tolerance thing is really great isn't it! You found a loving female wife who wants children surrounded by your perverse teachings. incredible

170 posted on 04/23/2003 2:18:37 PM PDT by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
If you're going to argue law, learn a little about it.

First, your contention that the EPC does not apply because of Selective Service is just wrong. There are a number of legal tests relating to application of the EPC - the fact that your example involves the military trumps almost all of those considerations. The Supreme Court has determined that Selective Service does not violate the EPC. It has not decided that private consensual sexual behavior is not subject to the EPC.

Texas can't say the law applies only to some people. Period. If they want to tell everyone they can't have oral or anal sex, that may be constitutional in Texas. But let them try to enforce that.

171 posted on 04/23/2003 2:18:55 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
By the way your right I do give the right to one and not the other. Simply because when the other gets tired of the back door he'll eventually go home and further civilization with. CHILDREN
172 posted on 04/23/2003 2:21:01 PM PDT by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

Comment #173 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnnyZ
Johnny, do us all a favor and go back to school. Prostitution is commerce, not sex.
174 posted on 04/23/2003 2:22:24 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
What was it the furthering of civilization thing!

I use that alot. I find it's really hard to rebutt that position since it's so accurate and makes you really set back and think of the reasons why GOD made the two different sexes. See ya.

175 posted on 04/23/2003 2:24:50 PM PDT by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
You've made something up yet again. Point to where I've challenged that rights are derived from God. You can't. You are just grasping at straws to support your claim that government can implement God's law.
176 posted on 04/23/2003 2:27:36 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
But if it's done in the privacy of one's own home? Or sexual abuse, in the privacy of one's own home? That's not criminal because of "privacy"?

Get a real argument!

177 posted on 04/23/2003 2:28:24 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (What two adults do in the privacy of their home IS my business. I'm the one holding the camera!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
How very intolerant and hateful of you.

Name calling when someone disagrees with your view.

How very typical.
178 posted on 04/23/2003 2:28:40 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
You never responded to my point on why we were given these rights by God, how we are a government founded by God, and as such, our freedoms were guaranteed because of God.

How can you allow for homosexuality to be a part of that history?

Will you ever respond to it, or will you call me names as well.
179 posted on 04/23/2003 2:30:12 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Disagrees? Yes, I guess you would consider claiming that I expose my children to perversity is simply "disagreeing" with me. That is typical of your logic.
180 posted on 04/23/2003 2:30:15 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson