Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kever
"People should be able to enjoy the freedom of having a smoke - but other people should enjoy the freedom of not having to smell it."

Agreed. I have a friend who owns a bar in Florida and guess what; he does not force non-smokers in there at gunpoint.
14 posted on 04/22/2003 2:34:06 PM PDT by Beck_isright ("We created underarm deodorant, and the French turned that down too."-Mitch Daniels, Budget Director)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Beck_isright
The reasoning for this law was that workers at these establisments have no choice but inhale the SHS, well, why didn't they just make it mandatory that every establishment furnish gas masks or chem suits for the employees who wish to wear them?

That would have taken care of the issue.

The issue is not whether you enjoy a smoke filled or smoke free room. You have the freedom to go to a smoking or non-smoking establishment.

16 posted on 04/22/2003 2:40:42 PM PDT by Outraged At FLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Beck_isright
I have a friend who owns a bar in Florida and guess what; he does not force non-smokers in there at gunpoint.

Unfortunately the brain-dead electorate here in Florida just voted for their own smoking ban.

29 posted on 04/22/2003 3:56:33 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson