[eagleman]

PatrickHenry writes,

The photos are garbage, they prove nothing at all. You can see people with numerous different head shapes today, they are all human nevertheless. To show that one evolved from another you would have to date with certainty each and every one of those skulls. Most of them cannot be dated.

Pure unsubstantiated bunk!!! Do you think you can just make up whatever the heck you want, without the slightest documentation, and not get caught doing it?

Here is a plot of fossil skull dates vs. fossil skull cranial capacities. Read it and weep.

Here is the source article, Falk et al. I'm sure that if you follow the references in the caption, the dating of every single skull in in the graph can be traced to peer-reviewed publications.

So far the creationists have offered up *nothing* in support of their views in this thread except for (1) unreferenced, unsubstantiated, and often disproved assertions and (2) insults about the character and religion of the evolutionists.

While their science sucks, you have to admit that they are doing a pretty good imitation of the Iraqi Information Minister.

[eagleman]

Ooops, I meant to say "gore3000" instead of "PatrickHenry" in the beginning of the previous message.

(I responded to a message by gore3000 who was responding to PatrickHenry)

[HalfFull]

Do you think you can just make up whatever the heck you want, without the slightest documentation, and not get caught doing it?

Sure they can...and they have. Just a few example of getting caught include The Nebraska Man, The Java Ape-Man, The Heidelberg Jaw, and the Piltdown Man.

the dating of every single skull in in the graph can be traced to peer-reviewed publications

Peer review from others in the evolution religion...how convincing.