Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
gore3000 writes,
Caught in a lie you try to continue with it through semantics and obfuscation. Ice is thicker than water. Therefore any compression of the snow will result in less than the 1 to 10 ratio of snow to water - as I already pointed out. Your 1 to 90 could have been called a mistake before this last post, but it can no longer be called that. You are intentionally making up stuff in an effort to deceive.
gore3000, *what* do you not understand about the difference between wet snow and dry snow? It was explained to you quite clearly, with a reference to boot, and you accuse him of "making stuff up in an effort to deceive"!!! Is this Christian behavior? Here is another page which proves his point: http://epswww.unm.edu/facstaff/gmeyer/envsc101/wk10glacial.htm ...from a lecture on glaciers. Various densities mentioned:

Snow - density ~0.05 g/cm3 or less for cold dry powder (density of water = 1.0), wet snow is more dense [...]

Glacial ice - density 0.85-0.9

gore3000 is the one "making stuff up".
386 posted on 04/24/2003 9:42:01 PM PDT by eagleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]


To: eagleman
He's still graupeling with the difference between snow and water.
387 posted on 04/24/2003 9:45:13 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson