Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
gore3000 writes,
It is for the above reasons that not even the most die-hard atheists are able to even formulate a hypothesis as to how life could have come from non-life.
Spoken without a whit of knowledge of the actual literature. See for example: Cavalier-Smith T. Obcells as proto-organisms: membrane heredity, lithophosphorylation, and the origins of the genetic code, the first cells, and photosynthesis. J Mol Evol. 2001 Oct-Nov;53(4-5):555-95. ...and 158 related articles
260 posted on 04/22/2003 7:41:27 AM PDT by eagleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: eagleman
It is for the above reasons that not even the most die-hard atheists are able to even formulate a hypothesis as to how life could have come from non-life. -me-
Spoken without a whit of knowledge of the actual literature.

Since you know so much more then take apart my statement yourself. Explain what I said has been proven wrong. You cannot. The atheists cannot explain how life arose and no I will not waste my time with your snow job of articles. If they prove me wrong, show it right here.

Hint: The first life had to be able to reproduce. Proto-organisms do not cut it. Proto-organisms, not being reproductive beings cannot evolve.

314 posted on 04/22/2003 8:37:19 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson