To: KeyLargo
So, as far as NOW is concerned, if some guy wants his girlfriend to have an abortion and she doesn't, he can just knock her out, perform a C section himself, murder the baby, and not be charged for murder! Now that's the kind of "civil" society we want to live in!
To: winner3000
You have to understand that there are those who want life without consequence... They want to fight against a percieved oppression in every concievable way.. in order to do this NOW must deny that the unseen is anything other than a mass of flesh. It is to deny the soul... whether you are pro-life for religious reasons or just for the pure sake of human decency.. The NOW gang radical agenda is purely motivated by their hatred toward men and any form of control that they may have.. even to the point of killing off a generation of women that may actually rally to their cause... It is ironic that the group that fights for Equal rights for women and reproductive rights (or the right to kill thier unborn child) are ready to crucify Dead Beat Dads who don't want to take care of thier children.. (not that I support Dead Beat dads).. But it would be a nice stick in the Eye if legislation were introduced for the Male Abortion...
Anytime from conception to the actual birth.. A prospective father in the presence of a witness can proclaim a male abortion. This would terminate any responsiblity for that child.. I mean lets face it... If a woman has the right to choose.. shouldn't the father?
To: winner3000
So, as far as NOW is concerned, if some guy wants his girlfriend to have an abortion and she doesn't, he can just knock her out, perform a C section himself, murder the baby, and not be charged for murder! Now that's the kind of "civil" society we want to live in! In states like New Jersey, the guy would not be charged with murder but he still would be charged with some type of assault. It is not as if his actions aren't criminal. I still think the NOW gals are going way over the top here. They are extremists to the hilt.
82 posted on
04/20/2003 8:25:03 AM PDT by
pchuck
To: winner3000
There was a case in Florida about 15 years ago, in which a drunk driver hit a woman, killing her 9-month-old fetus. He was charged with murder, but a federal court threw out the conviction. I knew some sidewalk counselors at the time, who reported that the Deathscorts were chanting the following Saturday morning: "We won in Florida! We won in Florida!" So the "right of privacy," found in the emanations and penumbras of the 9th, 10th, and 14th Ameindments, includes the right of drunk drivers to kill babies!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson