To: Joy Angela
I think we are going to learn she was murdered on Dec 23.
Do I remember someone posting that amniotic fluid and vomit were found on a mop in the home? Does anyone know if this is true and where this information came from? If true, it is the smoking gun.
To: Trust but Verify
"...amniotic fluid and vomit were found on a mop in the home?"That's a one-way ticket to San Quentin.
243 posted on
04/18/2003 3:52:52 PM PDT by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Trust but Verify
I think we are going to learn she was murdered on Dec 23. Me too. I've thought that for a long time now. Remember that the drapes were never opened? I suspect he couldn't risk someone looking in the window and seeing a mess before he disposed of the body. Also, no one ever came forward to witness seeing Laci walk that dog. She was probably long dead by then, IMHO.
To: Trust but Verify
I think we are going to learn she was murdered on Dec 23. I have to admit I don't know every detail about this case, but what day was Laci seen walking her dog? Dec 23 or 24?
To: Trust but Verify
No, in that post, it was *blood* and vomit on the mop. Not amniotic fluid and vomit.
Now, blood and vomit can get on a mop in other ways besides cleaning up after violent killings. And stuff that gets in a mop can stay there for the life of the mop.
As a woman who threw up a great deal during pregnancy, I can state unequivocably that vomit is one thing you would have found in at least trace amounts on my mop.
Blood can also get in a mop and stay there...from ordinary events.
The point is, the mop alone won't convict anyone of murder, but it can be used to suggest a clean-up of a crime scene.
755 posted on
04/18/2003 6:00:16 PM PDT by
SarahW
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson