[FourPeas]

If you go and read the brief, it's easy to see that "Dr." Winn's offered testimony is a crock. The supposition that the substitution of "tigers" for the n-word likens black to animals is her opinion, apparently based on absolutely NO fact. "Dr." Winn expertise is in philosophy; she is an "educator". I think that says it all.

[jonathanmo]

Absolutely correct...I believe it just shows the bottom-feeding depths that lawyers and their "experts" will go to in such ludicrous lawsuits...