Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clerics claim control of Iraq's holy cities
Japan Today ^ | Thursday, April 17, 2003 at 07:25 JST

Posted on 04/16/2003 9:31:55 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

NAJAF, Iraq — In this holiest of Muslim Shiite cities, clerics are running a self-declared government. It's the same in nearby Karbala, another sacred Shiite city.

Muslim Shiite clerics have in the past week moved swiftly to fill the power void created by Saddam Hussein's ouster — appointing governors, imposing curfews, offering protection, jobs, health care and giving financial assistance to the needy.

In some respects, they have replaced Saddam as Iraq's new leadership.

Ominously, they distrust the Americans who rid them of Saddam's tyranny and have little faith in the opposition leaders now returning to Iraq from years in exile. They also question whether Western democratic values are suited for their country.

And, they seem unwilling to surrender authority to a central government they don't like.

Shiites make up 60% of Iraq's 24 million people, but have traditionally been pushed to the political sidelines by members of Islam's mainstream Sunni sect, of which Saddam is a member. They have long complained of religious persecution under Saddam and erupted in jubilation at his downfall, practicing their rituals in public for the first time in years.

Scores of Shiite pilgrims can now be seen walking on highways and country roads to Najaf and Karbala, carrying the black flags that mourn the 7th century "martyrdom" of al-Hussein, one of the sect's most revered saints. Al-Hussein's shrine is in Karbala, while his father, Imam Ali, son-in-law of Islam's Prophet Muhammad, is buried in Najaf.

Such instant Shiite empowerment could reverberate in an Iraq whose social and political fabric is fragile in the aftermath of war and the removal of a president whose iron-fist policies held the country together. It also could provoke a Sunni backlash or spark inter-Shiite violence when the sect's factions are vying for position in a new order.

In today's Iraq, the power of the "al-Hawza al-Ilmiya" — an Arabic phrase that roughly means the supreme seat of Shiite learning — is second only to that of U.S. forces. It is something of a magic phrase that has become associated with authority or government.

Sheik Abbas al-Rabia'i, a 42-year-old Shiite cleric who has just come out of four years in hiding from Saddam's fearsome security apparatus, is a hard-line cleric with blind loyalty to the al-Hawza al-Ilmiya.

Squatting on the floor of a tiny house on a back alley in Najaf, he said the al-Hawza would be prepared to surrender power to a government the people approve of, but hastened to add: "It must be a government that has been freely elected and is not under any foreign influence."

"We don't say anything or do anything without the approval of the al-Hawza. We are only foot soldiers," said al-Rabia'i.

The extent of al-Hawza's influence is perhaps best manifested by orders it issued this week. Posted on the outer wall of Karbala's al-Hussein Mosque, one of the holiest Shiite shrines, it orders the city's Shiites not to organize marches without its prior approval and bans anyone from joining a political party without its permission.

"It's absolutely forbidden to speak to news agencies," says another order. "When something happens, don't act. Wait for instructions from al-Hawza," says another.

Sheik Mohanad al-Assadi is a 28-year-old Shiite scholar in Karbala. On Wednesday, he met with Youssef al-Haboubi, the long-serving civil servant appointed governor of Karbala by the al-Hawza this week, to discuss city affairs. Before him, he conferred with a doctor, police officers and ordinary people who sought his help to find jobs. He has bodyguards, a precaution after two senior clerics were killed by an angry crowd in Najaf last week.

"Al-Hawza is not contemplating the permanent assumption of executive power through it own members," he explains in a soft voice at the Spartan al-Mokheim Mosque in Karbala. "We have those whom we trust to do this for us."

Assadi used diplomatic language to express his views on Iraq's opposition returnees, saying that while senior Shiite clerics appreciated their efforts, "justice" must be done for those who stayed in Iraq and endured Saddam's oppression.

Al-Rabia'i was more blunt.

He said many Iraqis would be uncomfortable with the rule of politicians who had spent decades abroad. "Many of them want to introduce Western democratic systems that don't suit us here. We have a people here who suffered so much for so long they cannot accept imported ideas."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: clerics; interimauthority; postwariraq; powerstruggle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Happy2BMe
A much DESERVED break!
21 posted on 04/16/2003 10:12:56 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic. Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DeepInEnemyTerritory
"I wonder if Islam, the way it is currently interpreted, is compatible with democracy. I don't think it is without a reformation."

You and 4/5th of the entire rest of the world!

22 posted on 04/16/2003 10:13:01 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thinktwice
Interim authority will be helpful

Except Islam never intends to be an interim authority.

23 posted on 04/16/2003 10:27:22 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Weren't Iraq and Kuwait one country once? Maybe the Kuwaitis should have a lot of say in how Iraq should be run since they are fairly reasonable types. Otherwise maybe it'd be better letting Iraq get divided up so Kurds get something, Shiites get something, Sunnis get something, and whoever else wants a piece gets something.
24 posted on 04/16/2003 10:29:41 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
maybe it'd be better letting Iraq get divided up so Kurds get something, Shiites get something, Sunnis get something, and whoever else wants a piece gets something.

I think a balkanization of Iraq is a strong possibility.




25 posted on 04/16/2003 10:32:28 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I think we should go in that direction ---it's probably the only way to get any kind of self-rule over there ---break it into smaller groups which would be independent of one another. Otherwise it would be one group trying to gain control of the oil wealth and persecuting all other groups. Or else just give it all to the Kuwaitis.
26 posted on 04/16/2003 10:41:33 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All
Squatting on the floor of a tiny house on a back alley in Najaf, he said the al-Hawza would be prepared to surrender power to a government the people approve of, but hastened to add: "It must be a government that has been freely elected and is not under any foreign influence."

I dare say that if the shoe was on the other foot not many here would disagree with his statement.

27 posted on 04/16/2003 11:19:15 PM PDT by Terp (Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
My prejudiced opinion is that it wouldn't matter how many pieces you divided Iraq into... even with their own little "states" or pieces of the pie, they would still find reasons to fight/war with each other. There just seems to be way too much interest in fighting for the sake of fighting. You know the type -- can't find a good thing to say about anything, always picking a fight, always holier-than-thou, etc.
28 posted on 04/16/2003 11:29:55 PM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
Ominously, they distrust the Americans who rid them of Saddam's tyranny and have little faith in the opposition leaders now returning to Iraq from years in exile. They also question whether Western democratic values are suited for their country.

I'll wait to see what the Iraqi PEOPLE have to say, not a bunch of psychoreligious wannabe tyrants.

29 posted on 04/16/2003 11:51:36 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: DeaconBenjamin
What keeps coming to mind is those that were hacked apart and a line from a kids series (called Dinosaurs - talking puppet dinosaurs): "We're gonna need another Timmy Mullah!"
31 posted on 04/17/2003 12:08:11 AM PDT by RasterMaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster
A couple of well-placed million bucks spread out among the mullahs ought to do the trick.
32 posted on 04/17/2003 12:22:49 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
We need to send the Kurd fighters into these towns in order to clean up the Shi'it
33 posted on 04/17/2003 12:35:31 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
This is normal, inevitable, predicted and manageable. The sky's not falling people. Don't panic.
34 posted on 04/17/2003 7:02:24 AM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Ignoring Islam in the middle east is dangerous.

Islam is a gift-wrapped, suicide bomb sanctification program.

35 posted on 04/17/2003 7:25:32 AM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
We must resist letting the clerics take over. It is what happened in Iran when the mullahs highjacked the revolution. They will not cede power willingly. We should continue to press for a secular society. Iraq was the most secular arab state along with Jordan.
36 posted on 04/17/2003 8:03:58 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeaconBenjamin
They also question whether Western democratic values are suited for their country.

It got them rid of Saddam, what else do they want? Pay debts to the Talebans and Ayatola? Right, sounds like a good deal for the "free" muslim.

37 posted on 04/17/2003 8:25:52 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

[un-PC comment]

The Arab world is a basket case. I'm not impressed with any of them. After about 2 months we should pull out and let the rabble-rousers go at each other.

[/un-PC comment]

38 posted on 04/17/2003 9:58:34 AM PDT by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
This is normal, inevitable, predicted and manageable. The sky's not falling people. Don't panic.

No panic. As you said, this is normal and predictable. "Manageable" remains the open question, however, as Islam's History indicates otherwise, without exception.

By all means, though, the experiement should continue. We'll all be edified, whatever the result.




39 posted on 04/17/2003 11:00:25 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Terp
"It must be a government that has been freely elected and is not under any foreign influence."

I wonder if this concept rules out the restoration of the Hashimite monarchy? That would be my number one preference.

40 posted on 04/17/2003 12:54:24 PM PDT by mac_truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson