To: The Old Hoosier
So you think all the reporters that worked for CNN withheld vital information from the United States government?
If true, they're all just as sleazy as Eason.
106 posted on
04/14/2003 7:40:04 PM PDT by
Howlin
(It's a great day to be an American -- or an Iraqi!)
To: Howlin
I don't know if I believe they told their reporters the entire story, why should I? They didn't tell their viewers. And exactly what was the point of this multiple year charade? If they had done it only recently to maintain a presence in Baghdad during the war, that's one thing. But no, they did it for years. Their idea of objective journalism was to attack Bush despite of their special knowledge of Saddam's regime. And I would still like to know if they told the rest of their talking heads of the situation in Baghdad, if they too are complicit in failing to report what they knew.
They make me sick.
111 posted on
04/14/2003 8:00:36 PM PDT by
Dolphy
To: Howlin
So you think all the reporters that worked for CNN withheld vital information from the United States government? 1) They're an independent news agency. They're not there to report to the U.S. government.
2) The government knew all about this stuff long ago, and didn't need CNN to tell them anything.
3) It isn't exactly vital information.
132 posted on
04/14/2003 9:14:44 PM PDT by
The Old Hoosier
(Support our troops: Bring them home.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson