To: Catspaw
now don't you all come down on me, but heros?
The POW's are special, but doesn't hero imply some special action or activity that "saved" or otherwise affected in a positive way the condition of others
1,088 posted on
04/13/2003 5:27:36 AM PDT by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America)
To: The Wizard
Given that they survived weeks in captivity at the hands of the Iraqis (see pictures of those torture chambers?), they're definitely heros in my book. Ditto for Pfc. Lynch. The rescuers hold a status higher than heros.
To: The Wizard
This arguement is easy to squelch. All our forces are heros.
To: The Wizard
OK, "hero" is a relative term.
Generally, as you imply, "hero" is reserved for those who have acted above-and-beyond in saving others or applying extra effor against the enemy.
I'm using the term loosely here....
"those who will get their own parade when they come home." :)
As I said, real loose definition.
1,096 posted on
04/13/2003 5:30:38 AM PDT by
Timeout
(I see happy!)
To: The Wizard
Anyone who serves his/her country, whether in combat, or on a supply mission, and is captured by the enemy and more than likely tortured by tis savage enemy, is a hero in any book.
How's that? ;0)
1,101 posted on
04/13/2003 5:32:43 AM PDT by
Jackie-O
("WANKER" is my new term of endearment for the Antis!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson