Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timmy
Timmywrote:
First of all, the "assault weapons ban" doesn't actually DO anything...
Not true.
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on the guilt."Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged"

Federal gun laws are the epitome of this precept in action. Depending on when a gun was made, the exact same firearm can be legal or illegal to possess. A folding stock on a pre-ban semiautomatic SKS is legal, but illegal on the post ban weapon. Not to mention that functionally, there is no difference between a pre and post ban weapon for the most part. The purpose of the law is only to create traps. Keeping track of these regs is all but impossible for most people.

So when you say that the law doesn't do anything, you are very mistaken. It can be used to write regulations which act as regulatory traps to ensnare innocent gun owners. If you don't think this power cannot be abused, you have been awake with your eyes wide shut. Just think of what would happen if some future president issued an executive order to enforce all firearms regulations and punishments for violations to the letter and to the max...after offering say, an unconditional amnesty for anyone turning in even possibly illegal weapons. Many people would turn in their guns just to be on the safe side.

As for Bush, he would and will sign this in a heartbeat, and for those who think the House will sunset it automatically, don't. Bush would and I predict will pressure House Republicans on the fence in safe districts to support this legislation and get it over the top in exchange for something else he wants. Bet on it.

628 posted on 04/14/2003 5:49:01 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies ]


To: Jesse
I know this is going to disappoint you, but I'm not into Ayn Rand philosophy. If we all acted like her, this country would be a heck of a mess.
629 posted on 04/14/2003 6:47:48 PM PDT by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 628 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson