Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmc813
Never forget that if Gore had been just a bit less of a gun-grabber he would have won the election

Maybe if Clinton wouldn't have shipped Elian back to Cuba Gore would have won Florida. Maybe if the press had not waited till 5 days before the election to run non-stop coverage of Bush's DUI from the 70s Bush would have won bigger than he did.

There's a difference between being anti-gun and not wanting people to be toting around machineguns, assault riffles, and other such guns.

323 posted on 04/12/2003 2:01:17 PM PDT by GOPyouth (Heather Nauert and Belly Girl are all that are women! SHAKAKHAN, Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: GOPyouth
a Republican majority House, Senate, White House, Supreme Court, State governers, why do we still have this gun control sheeot oh yeah soccer moms
327 posted on 04/12/2003 2:05:14 PM PDT by conservativefromGa (www.awbansunset.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: GOPyouth
"There's a difference between being anti-gun and not wanting people to be toting around machineguns, assault riffles, and other such guns."

Really? Do explain!

You might educate yourself about the functional difference between your average deer rifle and so-called "assault rifles" targeted by the anti-freedom crowd before jumping in, here. Just a suggestion. You know, to save you some embarrassment.
354 posted on 04/12/2003 2:58:47 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: GOPyouth
There's a difference between being anti-gun and not wanting people to be toting around machineguns, assault riffles, and other such guns.

Agreed, but those who don't want people to tote around machine guns, rifles, and other such guns are anti-2nd Amendment. That's almost as bad as being completely anti-gun.
364 posted on 04/12/2003 3:19:16 PM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: GOPyouth
There's a difference between being anti-gun and not wanting people to be toting around machineguns, assault riffles, and other such guns.

And fools like you would make criminals out of people simply for wanting to own the same kind weapon that their grandfather did... for just owning a thing that might have some sentimental value, or that they are simply fascinated by, you would happily throw innocent people in jail and take away their right to vote. You're truly a champion of the rights of citizens.

477 posted on 04/12/2003 6:39:21 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: GOPyouth
"There's a difference between being anti-gun and not wanting people to be toting around machineguns, assault riffles, and other such guns."

Typical anti-gunner talk and language. As a legal owner of machine guns, I 1. do not "tote" them around as you state and 2. I am offended by your remark.

Mike

618 posted on 04/14/2003 5:27:11 AM PDT by BCR #226
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson