Just for the sake of argument, since he's 'telling all,' what reason would he have for NOT stating in the article that he informed the United States government?
I'll say this again: that man was a HUGE source to us; and he's dead. If we had know about the plot, he'd be here today.
Because there are still other dictatorships in the world. Can you really expect them to broadcast that they were CIA informants? How many people would die in Syria? North Korea? Iran? etc. etc.
Don't get me wrong, I'm incredibly pissed about their biased reporting and will never forgive the war slut especially. And like you I am conflicted. I guess I just don't know what purpose could be served by broadcasting that they're CIA informants. The answer, imo, is to rid the world of brutal tyrants once and for all. Thank God for Bush, Rummy, and Rice.