To: Poohbah
FOX interviewing Pittsburg Tribune Review reporter on site in Iraq. He was in the right place for the find. What more do you want? They are saying what "they believe" is weapons grade plutonium and "interesting other things".
Good be old..could be new materials. It is where the missile waters were pointed out by civilians. Doesn't mean anything..then again could be of interest.
F_T_D
To: fight_truth_decay
I'm just saying that Fox has been awful quick to release reports, only to have to say "Uh...nevermind."
264 posted on
04/10/2003 11:27:51 AM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
To: fight_truth_decay
The key aspect is that there currently does not exist an actual text article on this, saying "plutonium" anywhere in the story.
And you've got a reporter who likely doesn't know an atom from his own rear-end talking to some Marine who likely has no PR experience or training who says "they believe" they've found some weapons-grade plutonium.
To: fight_truth_decay
I'm no scientist, but can you identify weapons grade plutonium just by looking at it? Have they run any tests on it? Do they even have the ability to do that in the field? This all sounds very conjectural.
To: fight_truth_decay
Has the reporter read the IAEA reports on this facility to see if he saw anything they missed. The WaPost suggests this is all old news.
293 posted on
04/10/2003 11:40:23 AM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson