I never said there was not a threat...in fact, if you look back at my posts you will find one where I acknowlege that the threat exists.
But that point is irrelevant to the fact that your statement brands you as a socialist liberal.
The Constitution is not a "living, breathing document" that changes as Society evolves. It specifically provides for a process for change in response to our evolving society. That process is called the amendment process.
Your desire to ignore that process based on a changing world illumates your liberal and socialist ideology.
Washington/Jefferson/Madison would demand the Constitution be followed and require an amendment(s) be passed. End of discussion.
Actually with Clinton taking the traditional (pre-9/11) American policy of ignoring foreign threats(not taking Bin ladin into custody when he had the chance etc.etc.), he set up the US for disaster.
The world has changed. America's new policy is to pre-emptively deal with potential threats to America. The world is not static, but we can still keep our basic freedoms and deal with the threats, unfortunately that does not work in your static unbending world, IMO.