1 posted on
04/09/2003 4:03:59 AM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Ribbit
2 posted on
04/09/2003 4:09:53 AM PDT by
PokeyJoe
(BBQ Iraqi Pork Ribs for Dinner.)
To: kattracks
Bush needs to resist this. France clearly sided with the enemy, negotiated with and intimidated Turkey and cost US lives. We must never forget the French who forgot and betrayed.
3 posted on
04/09/2003 4:10:30 AM PDT by
paguch
To: All
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER
|
4 posted on
04/09/2003 4:11:05 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kattracks
5 posted on
04/09/2003 4:11:51 AM PDT by
Nitro
To: kattracks
Sounds like Reuters is going a little Clintonesque - they have the same problem with "united front" that he had with "is".
7 posted on
04/09/2003 4:40:08 AM PDT by
trebb
To: kattracks
Well, looks like the period of marching shoulder to shoulder with the Brits is fini.
8 posted on
04/09/2003 4:43:17 AM PDT by
ricpic
To: kattracks
French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin said after a breakfast meeting with British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw that he backed a pledge by Britain and the United States to give the United Nations a vital role in Iraq's rebuilding. Surrendering again. At least they're consistent.
To: kattracks
""We agree that the United Nations should be given a full role. The more united the international community is, the better the chances of the (reconstruction) process being successful," Villepin told a press briefing."
I concur with that statement.
So how long until we can get 50,000 frogs into the desert for mine-clearing duty?
V
11 posted on
04/09/2003 4:49:21 AM PDT by
Beck_isright
(FLASH: CNN hires Baghdad Bob as new Operation Iraqi Freedom Military Analyst)
To: kattracks
Someone needs to explain to the British Foreign Office that stabbing the US in the back during the Reconstruction of Iraq will be regarded as little better than having done so before and during the war.
12 posted on
04/09/2003 5:18:41 AM PDT by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Mesopotamiam Esse Delendam -- soon to be Mesopotamia Delenda Est)
![](http://www.accutek.com/vulture/vulturethumb.JPG)
UN Vulture Alert!
13 posted on
04/09/2003 5:51:06 AM PDT by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: kattracks
Britain -United States to give the United Nations a vital role in Iraq's rebuilding.
France - "We agree that the United Nations should be given a full role."
See la difference? I say vital, as in necessary, you say full, as in
covering every aspect. This is why diplomacy is so chicken shit.
There is no united front and the French are going to squeal like the
pigs they are when they find out that 'vital' means sending food.
14 posted on
04/09/2003 2:49:22 PM PDT by
gcruse
(If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson