Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We will handle trials, say Americans
The Daily Telegraph - UK ^ | April 8, 2003 | David Rennie in Washington

Posted on 04/07/2003 7:35:45 PM PDT by UnklGene

We will handle trials, say Americans By David Rennie in Washington (Filed: 08/04/2003)

The United States has the "sovereign right" to prosecute Iraqi leaders for war crimes in its own courts, and will not hand Saddam Hussein or his henchmen to any international tribunal, senior American officials said yesterday.

A prisoner is escorted back to his cell at Guatanamo Bay where the US has sole jurisdiction over the suspected terrorists held In a move likely to alarm Downing Street, senior Pentagon and State Department officials summoned reporters to hear a pre-emptive rejection of any role for the International Criminal Court (ICC) - the permanent war crimes tribunal established in The Hague.

Instead, Iraqi leaders accused of war crimes could be tried in federal courts in the United States, or by special military tribunals, they said. The United States had the right to imprison those found guilty, or sentence them to death. Britain, as its ally in the war, would have the same rights.

The Bush administration has aggressively resisted the authority of the ICC, saying it fears that its military personnel and other citizens might be singled out for politically motivated prosecutions. To Britain's dismay, Washington last year "unsigned" the treaty establishing the court, and has leaned on allies worldwide to sign agreements shielding American citizens from any potential ICC probe.

Pierre-Richard Prosper, the United States ambassador for war crimes issues, said the ICC had no jurisdiction over this war, because neither America nor Iraq had signed up to the treaty establishing the court.

W Hay Parks, a senior Pentagon lawyer, accused Baghdad of three specific violations of the Geneva Convention and the rules of warfare, and said others were being investigated and catalogued.

The first two alleged war crimes centred on Iraqi television footage of American soldiers captured and killed when their supply convoy was ambushed near the southern city of Nasiriyah, Mr Parks said.

A third crime involved alleged acts of "perfidy", when Iraqi forces attacked coalition troops while carrying the white flags of surrender, or while disguised in civilian clothes.

Mr Parks said that further charges might be levelled, amid signs that prisoners of war might have been killed, tortured, or treated inhumanely.

The mention of humane treatment raised the prospect that a teenage soldier rescued last week might become a key witness against the Iraqi regime. Pte Jessica Lynch, 19, is the only American prisoner of war to have returned to American custody.

There were initial reports that some members of the 507th Maintenance Company - Pte Lynch's unit whose supply convoy was ambushed at Nasiriyah - had been executed in cold blood.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: hagueicc; iraqifreedom; warcrimes

1 posted on 04/07/2003 7:35:45 PM PDT by UnklGene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Pierre-Richard Prosper, the United States ambassador for war crimes issues, said the ICC had no jurisdiction over this war, because neither America nor Iraq had signed up to the treaty establishing the court.

Funny how it works for the big guys...

2 posted on 04/07/2003 7:39:07 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Send 'em to Gitmo, try them in front of a military tribunal, feed their remains to the sharks.

I lost all patience when I heard about them murdering our POWs.

3 posted on 04/07/2003 7:43:13 PM PDT by LibKill (Nuke Berlin! Better late than never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
GW, RUMMY, CONDI & (even) COLIN:

Uk-fay u-ya, UN-yaa. U-ya ar-way ussilanimous-pay oofter-pay eenie-ways.

4 posted on 04/07/2003 7:43:16 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
Thank God Bush understands the dangers of the ICC. Even if he had done nothing else, torpedoing that and the Kyoto Treaty would be enough to set his presidency apart from his predecessors.
5 posted on 04/07/2003 7:51:18 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
"Funny how it works for the big guys..."

The ICC is just a gussied up version of the hopelessly corrupt U.N.-- why in the world do you think we should subordinate our sovereignty to either?
6 posted on 04/07/2003 7:54:43 PM PDT by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Send 'em to Gitmo

What a bleeding heart. :-)

If the troops don't have throw down guns for when they run into the big fish, then I don't know nuttin.

7 posted on 04/07/2003 7:55:03 PM PDT by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: walden
I should have elaborated abit...

Believe me, I'm in your corner. I voiced in often when Clinton signed in on ICC. I just get a kick out of the tactics used by the big boys when we really mean no...lol...

8 posted on 04/07/2003 8:00:15 PM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
This is crap.

Any trials should be judged by a tribunal of Iraqi's and members of the coalition of the willing.

And to hell with the U.N.!

Those who endured the unchecked hatred and wrath of Saddam, and those nations who risked the lives of their soldiers, and supported the cause when they had nothing to risk, deserve to decide such things.

No one else.


9 posted on 04/07/2003 8:15:31 PM PDT by ChuckSnow5 (France has slit her own throat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
"Hey guys, hear that? The U.N. thinks it should be part of the post war tribunals . . "


10 posted on 04/07/2003 8:24:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Remember the 507th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
After reading this article, I need to get one of those double-wide Rummy podiums.
11 posted on 04/07/2003 9:45:17 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnklGene
...senior Pentagon and State Department officials summoned reporters to hear a pre-emptive rejection of any role for the International Criminal Court (ICC) - the permanent war crimes tribunal established in The Hague.

Oh, good, good, GOOD... I was hoping for this, in an earlier posting.

Once again, Bush has met my expectations, standing up to "World Opinion"... (Scurry off, you damn rodents!)

12 posted on 04/07/2003 11:45:28 PM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson