[Gunslingr3]

The Supreme Court historically has been protective of First Amendment rights of unsavory or unpopular groups and causes, including the Klan, flag-burners, pornographers and strippers.

And the country is far the poorer for it.

Would we be a 'richer' nation if who was allowed to speak was determined by a pool of 9 individuals and their perception of savory and unsavory? I'm sure there are plenty of people interested in such a power, and not fond of Free Republic...

[HumanaeVitae]

Would we be a 'richer' nation if who was allowed to speak was determined by a pool of 9 individuals and their perception of savory and unsavory?

You're making my point. The SCOTUS strikes down state laws regarding pornography, homosexuality, etc. in direct contravention of the will of the voters of that state. That's what I mean.