To: Dane
Agreed. I consider this a victory, and quite frankly, limiting the trial lawyers and their efforts to serve as a furth branch of government is a good thing.
It is not as far as I would go, but we have struck a blow to the trial lawyers that they CANNOT recover from.
35 posted on
04/07/2003 11:36:10 AM PDT by
hchutch
("But tonight we get EVEN!" - Ice-T)
To: hchutch
Yeah, because it's not that we would want to actually be able to punish companies for flagrant violations of the law or anything.
I mean, heck, if you're a Fortune 500 company, you should be above the law, right?
Today's affirmation (and I stress "affirmation," since this has been the law since 1996) serves to do nothing but further insure that big companies are completely insulated from their wrongdoing.
To: hchutch
Agreed. I consider this a victory, and quite frankly, limiting the trial lawyers and their efforts to serve as a furth branch of government is a good thing. It is not as far as I would go, but we have struck a blow to the trial lawyers that they CANNOT recover from.
John Edwards and his cronies are not happy campers today.
SCOTUS just filed a decision against the economic terrorism of trial lawyers.
39 posted on
04/07/2003 11:49:42 AM PDT by
Dane
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson