Correct me if I'm wrong here, but couldn't (and wouldn't) the Smarts rightfully sue the pants off of anyone who did a TV movie about them without their consent?
That argument doesn't hold water.
Considering the thousands of childrens that go missing every year, shouldn't there also, then, by your reasoning, be nothing on TV but TV-movies about missing children?
Fine, go back to name-calling those of us who dare question the Smart's "wonderful story". Not a single one of us has said we wish anything but the best for Elizabeth, but...well, if you want to draw comparisons to the Simpson jury, I'm afraid that it appears YOU guys are the ones with your heads buried in the sand on this one.
Flame away. Not like we're not used to it from you guys. I hope you enjoy the TV-movie of this "wonderful story" when it comes out. ;-)
How so? You can go into any bookstore and but an 'unauthorized biography' on most any famous person. Do you think the Kennedy's can sue anybody who does a movie on JKF or RFK?
I hope you enjoy the TV-movie of this "wonderful story" when it comes out.
It was a wonderful story... or at least a tragic story with an ending much better than anyone could have hoped for. Elizabeth should not be the target of wrath from you people simply because her family has its problem and her dad is... squishy.
Do you people also believe that recovered POW Jessica Lynch shot herself in the foot so she could be captured and raped by "one of those burly Republican Guard soldiers"?