To: dead
Novak's right. It will be quite embarrassing if we don't find substantial evidence of WMD. But the Bush administration has been nothing if not politically brilliant in letting their critics make total asses of themselves. It's quite possible that they are sitting on the evidence, waiting for the critics, eurinals and domestic, to bitch about the lack of evidence. After letting them dig their own holes for a few days, they'll release the proof to the media.
Your thoughts a couple of years later?
46 posted on
11/07/2005 4:40:57 PM PST by
Huck
(:-))
To: Huck
What's quite possible is not always what is.
And the lack of WMDs has turned out to be a bit of an embarrassment.
47 posted on
11/07/2005 7:49:03 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Huck
Yea, I know this is a couple of years old. My two cents, they trucked most of the evidence to Syria before and during the war.
Are you suggesting Iraq didn't have WMD's?
48 posted on
11/07/2005 7:54:27 PM PST by
saleman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson