Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead
Novak's right. It will be quite embarrassing if we don't find substantial evidence of WMD.

But the Bush administration has been nothing if not politically brilliant in letting their critics make total asses of themselves. It's quite possible that they are sitting on the evidence, waiting for the critics, eurinals and domestic, to bitch about the lack of evidence. After letting them dig their own holes for a few days, they'll release the proof to the media.

Your thoughts a couple of years later?

46 posted on 11/07/2005 4:40:57 PM PST by Huck (:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
What's quite possible is not always what is.

And the lack of WMDs has turned out to be a bit of an embarrassment.

47 posted on 11/07/2005 7:49:03 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Yea, I know this is a couple of years old. My two cents, they trucked most of the evidence to Syria before and during the war.

Are you suggesting Iraq didn't have WMD's?
48 posted on 11/07/2005 7:54:27 PM PST by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson