[VMI70]

She is in the army. Her right to privacy ends at the point where it will affect the mission and the overall well being of her fellow servicemen. Her being rescued has nothing to do with it.

Mabel-I did not see anything about their torture. Could you please point me to the thread?
As I recall, there were two women captured in GW I. One of them publically said that she was raped, the other did not, but at the time it was generally assumed that she was.

My feeling is that no woman should have been put in a position where something as horrible as that could happen to them. It infuriates me beyond comprehension.
Howeber, in order to take measures to prevent it, it must be known. I don't like it anymore than anybody else, but there is a bigger consideration here.

[Catspaw]

She is in the army. Her right to privacy ends at the point where it will affect the mission and the overall well being of her fellow servicemen. Her being rescued has nothing to do with it.

Really? Is your right to privacy determined by someone else? And why is it up to you to decide whether she's waived her right to privacy by being in the Army?