To: Ragtime Cowgirl
should we start talking about what is going to happen if we don't find chemical weapons anywhere in Iraq?
To: Julliardsux
Believe me. Even if we don't find any chemical weapons, we will find chemical weapons.
4,363 posted on
04/03/2003 7:50:44 PM PST by
Poser
To: Julliardsux
should we start talking about what is going to happen if we don't find chemical weapons anywhere in Iraq?Love means never having to say you're sorry.
4,368 posted on
04/03/2003 7:51:19 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Let the liberals whine, it's what they do!)
To: Julliardsux
should we start talking about what is going to happen if we don't find chemical weapons anywhere in Iraq? We'll have to go into Syria and retrieve them.
4,385 posted on
04/03/2003 7:54:38 PM PST by
ez
(...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.)
To: Julliardsux
should we start talking about what is going to happen if we don't find chemical weapons anywhere in Iraq?Patience. I don't believe they're worried in the WH or the Pentagon.
4,392 posted on
04/03/2003 7:55:50 PM PST by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("Tom Franks is the man on the ground. If he wants something...he'll call." - SOD Rumsfeld)
To: Julliardsux
We were talking about this today. We first need to get control of the country so we can look for them the military way. Besides, I believe Syria is a part if Iraq.
4,421 posted on
04/03/2003 8:00:54 PM PST by
Armed Civilian
(Extremisim in defense of liberty is a virtue and moderation in pursuit of justice is no vice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson