To: kattracks
Why not just title the story, "Bush didn't rescue Jessica, personally"?
To: arkfreepdom
Why not just title the story, "Bush didn't rescue Jessica, personally"? Yes. Of course, regardless of the facts we would have gotten "Clinton Personally Orders Daring Rescue (Lynch also invited to intern at White House)!"
6 posted on
04/02/2003 3:06:08 PM PST by
montag813
To: arkfreepdom
Good one.
To: arkfreepdom
I couldn't agree more. That's a title with an agenda.
19 posted on
04/02/2003 3:12:05 PM PST by
Clara Lou
(Well, he still has a nose, But, my, how it grows When the facts must conform to his views.)
To: arkfreepdom; Howlin; kattracks
Slightly off topic--on talk radio about 30 minutes ago, heard the reason Jessica was rescued last night is because they were tipped off that she was scheduled to be executed today.
Again--heard this as unsubstantiated on talk radio, and can't find anything more about this. Anyone know more about this rumor?
20 posted on
04/02/2003 3:12:44 PM PST by
NautiNurse
(Usama bin Laden has produced more tapes than Steely Dan)
To: arkfreepdom
I swear you would think Bush tried to keep them from going to rescue her looking at that title.
31 posted on
04/02/2003 3:26:15 PM PST by
Lanza
To: arkfreepdom
Yes and why were the press not asking questions about Clinton up in the Oval Office with his girl friend, while Arafat was 'waiting' to speak with him??
Does anyone remember this??
To: arkfreepdom
Exactly! A good, wise, leader surrounds himself with excellence in making decisions and delegating.The military is doing well with this Commander-In-Chief, as they are not ordered to bomb aspirin factories and chinese embassies and then get blamed liked Clinton did.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson