To: Oldeconomybuyer
Arnett is only allowed in Baghdad because he is a proven Quisling.
He is only allowed to speak what his Iraqi censors allow him to say.
So, for AP to run such a story is a journalistic abomination and can serve no other purpose than to give aid and comfort to the enemy.
9 posted on
03/30/2003 5:26:29 AM PST by
cgbg
(We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
To: cgbg
I say it's time to create a new word for people who give false hope to terrorists and their allies: an "arnett" or a "ritter."
Use it in a sentence: "If not for the efforts of a few ritters, Baghdad might have fallen without a fight in 2003. As it was, a few arnetts caused many civilian casualties that probably should not have happened."
14 posted on
03/30/2003 5:29:51 AM PST by
LS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson