Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Arnett is only allowed in Baghdad because he is a proven Quisling.

He is only allowed to speak what his Iraqi censors allow him to say.

So, for AP to run such a story is a journalistic abomination and can serve no other purpose than to give aid and comfort to the enemy.
9 posted on 03/30/2003 5:26:29 AM PST by cgbg (We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg
I say it's time to create a new word for people who give false hope to terrorists and their allies: an "arnett" or a "ritter."

Use it in a sentence: "If not for the efforts of a few ritters, Baghdad might have fallen without a fight in 2003. As it was, a few arnetts caused many civilian casualties that probably should not have happened."

14 posted on 03/30/2003 5:29:51 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson