Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chemical arms moved to Republican Guard, Iraqi POWs say
NYT via Star Tribune ^ | Mar 28, 2003 | Bernard Weinraub

Posted on 03/27/2003 10:39:52 PM PST by Diddley

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:38:44 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Statements from Iraqi prisoners of war and electronic eavesdropping on Iraqi government communications indicate that Saddam Hussein has moved chemical weapons to the Medina Division, one of three Republican Guard divisions guarding the approaches to Baghdad, Army officials have said.


(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baghdaddefense; chemicalarms; illegalweapons; medinadivision; pow; republicanguard; roadtobaghdad; vcorps; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
"Saddam Hussein has moved chemical weapons to the Medina Division."
Monitoring the movement of chemical weapons was difficult because Saddam often hides chemical pellets inside bunkers that carry conventional armaments.
American forces might receive an early warning if satellite photos picked up Iraqi units wearing protective gear.
1 posted on 03/27/2003 10:39:52 PM PST by Diddley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diddley
This might be what Rick Leveanthal of FOX was talking about??
2 posted on 03/27/2003 10:40:59 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
Whoa. This is getting really scary now.

No wonder Hans Blix decided to resign.

God protect our troops!

3 posted on 03/27/2003 10:43:10 PM PST by Wphile (The debate is over. Let's roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Diddley
officers said Saddam might be calculating that the step would actually turn to his advantage and stunt the American assault

How much time between when the first chem bomb hits and when we send a nuke cruise missile to where it originated.

5 posted on 03/27/2003 10:45:31 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Carpet bomb the entire Medina infested region, then bomb them again following assessment of damage, then drive to Baghdad as the bombs fall on the Hammurabi Division.
6 posted on 03/27/2003 10:46:17 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Diddley
If somehow an operation could get proof of WMDs, Sadaam would crumble. If anyone really has a current location for WMDs, they should make use of that intell.
7 posted on 03/27/2003 10:51:41 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddley
Well, if they use them. Let's nuke the Medina division .. and then then Medina city as a warning to the rest of the Arabs.
8 posted on 03/27/2003 10:53:27 PM PST by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dialup Llama
Would there perhaps be some way we could "sniff" the stuff out, knowing its general nature and general location. Such as with chemical detectors or dogs.
9 posted on 03/27/2003 10:54:40 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diddley
Oh COME ON! Nuke the son of a bitch. Who cares about world opinion. They use WMD we have the right to use nukes. Let's finish this.
10 posted on 03/27/2003 10:55:25 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
This might be what Rick Leveanthal of FOX was talking about??

I think it's related but not the same.

11 posted on 03/27/2003 10:56:22 PM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
They should use napalm. It burns that stuff up and won't have such a lasting effect. In fact, I think the fires around Baghdad are intended to act as a filter and burn up whatever slime clouds wander towards the city.
12 posted on 03/27/2003 11:00:29 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diddley
Bush should make it clear that any Chemical Attack and from this point on we dip all bullets in pig's blood and no Iraq soldiers is going to Paradise.

They don't fear nukes like they fear pork.
13 posted on 03/27/2003 11:00:45 PM PST by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Military officials said that, in the event of a chemical attack, American forces might receive an early warning if satellite photos picked up Iraqi units wearing protective gear against chemicals at a weapons site.

Could this be the reason he keeps lighting the oil pits around Bagdad?

14 posted on 03/27/2003 11:01:04 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Ummmmmm

I think since we are within probably 30 miles of the Republican Guard, a nuke would probably affect us as well.

I think a few MOABS would do just fine on all that artillery.
15 posted on 03/27/2003 11:01:45 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Could be. The whole scenario scares the living daylights out of me.

I'm going to bed.

16 posted on 03/27/2003 11:02:26 PM PST by Wphile (The debate is over. Let's roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
15 mins
17 posted on 03/27/2003 11:02:46 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diddley
Maybe this is a stupid question, but if we bombarded the arsenals where chemical weapons are stored, wouldn't this cause the chemical agents to escape, killing iraqi troops in the area?
18 posted on 03/27/2003 11:03:45 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
No, lets Nuke France, after all, if it wasn't for them we wouldn't be in this position.
19 posted on 03/27/2003 11:04:11 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bart99
Agreed... MOAB would be perfect. Let's toss one and see what happens with the new toy. We're on the edge here. We've GOT to be proactive and kill these pigs first!
20 posted on 03/27/2003 11:05:02 PM PST by thermodynamics (Huge Fan of Ivan! Long live the Great Tony Blair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson