Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right_in_Virginia
Silkworm is an anti-ship missile. As to whether it was on the banned list, there's an interesting conundrum.

If it were fired FROM land and hit land, then it might be considered a "surface to surface" missile, which was NOT banned....except for range. If a surface to surface missile exceeded 150 km, then it has a range exceeding Iraq sanctions.

That's the conundrum: Is it a surface to surface? And if so, does one judge its legality by the missile's possible range, or by the range it actually travelled (which we don't know yet.

2,951 posted on 03/28/2003 4:34:53 PM PST by Timeout (...an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm--GWB inaugural address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2925 | View Replies ]


To: Timeout
I think I can clear this up:

The U.N. sanctions and agreements for cease-fire from Gulf War 1 would obviously include a ban on striking any other country in any way. I mean, they'd be meaningless without a clause like that, wouldn't they?

OK, OK, never mind....

2,965 posted on 03/28/2003 4:39:02 PM PST by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2951 | View Replies ]

To: Timeout; All
Thank you, too, friend.

I really appreciate all who take the time to answer a question from one who knows so little about military weapons...it really helps.

2,966 posted on 03/28/2003 4:39:33 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2951 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson