Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: An.American.Expatriate
Chemical Prtoection Equipment only proves they intended to defend themselves from exposure.

Not true. You wear them because you want to limit your exposure when deploying them and when they come back at you.

1,566 posted on 03/28/2003 7:38:38 AM PST by AppyPappy (Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1554 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
Not true. You wear them because you want to limit your exposure when deploying them and when they come back at you.

Then why do our guys have them on??

1,577 posted on 03/28/2003 7:40:53 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
You wear them because you want to limit your exposure when deploying them and when they come back at you.

Right,having them on is no treat, you wear them only when it is absolutely necessary, when you are handling it or an attack is imminent.

1,583 posted on 03/28/2003 7:42:33 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy; An.American.Expatriate

Chemical Prtoection Equipment only proves they intended to defend themselves from exposure.

Not true. You wear them because you want to limit your exposure when deploying them and when they come back at you.

So, based on that reasoning Appy, why are Coalition forces wearing chemsuits?

I know we're on the side of the angels here, but you gotta look at it both ways.

1,676 posted on 03/28/2003 8:09:10 AM PST by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson