”Even an atheist would rather have his neighbor emulate Jesus instead of Mohammed.”
Made to a poster other than me, and commenting on our ongoing discussion.
Maybe you just don’t consider being called an atheist an insult and that’s why you missed the comment.
”In order to skirt the issue of the character of Mohammed, you've now attempted to place Joshua on the same moral plane as Mohammed. Isn't this known in some circles as "moral relativism?”That’s taking my words, twisting their meaning, and creating the opportunity to level a personal insult by falsely accusing me of using “moral relativism”.
”The mental hopscotch necessary to conclude that "moderate Muslims" represent the real Islam requires real disingenuousness…”
Imagine that, and I have yet to respond with my first personal commentary.
”It's quite unfortunate, really, because in turning away, you've wandered into one heresy, ecumenism, to defend another, Islam.”
Now he’s callingh me a heretic…then again, you may not consider that an insult either.
By the way, up to this point, the only thing that I said to Toothy that you quoted me on, was accusing him of doing work for Usama bin Laden…and strangely, Pat Buchanan seems to agree with me on that one.
”Anyway, I keep forgetting you have a three hour head start on me. I'm sipping some Glenmorangie. You?
I see that you included my response to this post as an example of my unwarranted personal attacks. I guess that according to your “code of honor”, it was perfectly fine for him to accuse me of being drunk, but not OK for me to do the same.
What you have displayed here, is one of the most blatant cases of intellectual dishonesty that I have ever come across in this forum.
Congratulations, you are now ready for DU.
Congratulations, you are now ready for DU.
Hilarious! I do nothing but quote you and it's "one of the most blatant cases of intellectual dishonesty" you've ever seen. LOL!
You might want to tone down the histrionics. They're what got you into trouble on this thread in the first place.