"If your daughter asks you whom you trust least, Moses, Jesus, or Mohammed, what would you say?"
I'd say, what are you doing dating dead men.
There are Christians I wouldn't trust, there are Jews I would't trust, and there are Muslims I wouldn't trust.
What you are trying to get me to do is to prejudge a person that I don't know, based on the actions of others.
Can't you get it through your head that I don't do that? I don't do it based on religion, I don't do it based on race, I don't do it based on nationality, I don't do it based on ethnicity...
If ask me whether I would trust my Muslim neighbor's son over a guy who is a member of the Ku Klux Klan, Christian Identity, Aryan Nations, 11th Hour Remnant Messenger, Aryan Brotherhood, or Neo-Nazion, I will pick my next-door neighbor's son.
Would you rather see your daughter date a member of Christian Identity, or Aryan Nation over a Muslim?
No, I'm trying to get you to address the evil nature of Mohammed, the founder of Islam.
Anyone who puts forth the proposition that bin Laden and the terrorists have twisted true Islam has an intellectual obligation to confront the truth about it's murderous founder, in whose footsteps they follow.
Are there moderate Muslims? Sure. Are they at all like Mohammed? No.
Would the world be a worse or better place if Islamic moderates sought to emulate Mohammed?
No. It would be worse, much worse. True Islam is evil, because its founder was evil.
Where does that leave us? Do we deny them the First Amendment rights available to eveyone in America, including Nazis and Klansmen? Of course not. However, we shouldn't make contorted pretenses about the true nature of Islam, coddle it, say that "Islam means peace," or say that the Koran is also "God's word."