Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. says will not cede control of Iraq to U.N.
Reuters | 3/26/03

Posted on 03/26/2003 2:20:23 PM PST by kattracks

U.S. says will not cede control of Iraq to U.N.

WASHINGTON, March 26 (Reuters) - The United States will not cede control of Iraq to the United Nations if and when it overthrows President Saddam Hussein, Secretary of State Colin Powell said on Wednesday.

"We didn't take on this huge burden with our coalition partners not to be able to have a significant dominating control over how it unfolds in the future," Powell told a House of Representatives subcommittee.

"We would not support ... essentially handing everything over to the U.N. for someone designated by the U.N. to suddenly become in charge of this whole operation," he added.

"We have picked on a greater obligation -- to make sure there is a functioning Iraqi government that is supported by the coalition, the center of gravity remaining with the coalition, military and civilian," he said.

Powell said the United Nations should, however, have a role in a post-Saddam Iraq, if only because it makes it easier for other countries to contribute to reconstruction costs.

"If we ask these nations to go get funds from their parliaments, it makes it a lot easier for them to get those funds and contribute those funds to the reconstruction effort ... if it has an international standing," he said.

The coalition is the Bush administration's term for the United States, Britain and the other minor contributors to the invasion of Iraq they launched last week.

The question of the U.N. role has come to the fore in the last few days because of debates in New York on the terms for releasing Iraqi oil money to pay for humanitarian relief.

The problem is expected to loom even larger if the United States takes control in Baghdad and then starts managing the Iraqi oil industry or seeking funds for reconstruction.

Washington will argue that as the victor it has the right to manage the transition to an Iraqi civilian government. Its opponents will say that the invasion was illegal and that the United Nations cannot endorse it retroactively.

Powell was speaking to the Commerce, Justice, State and Judiciary subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee.

03/26/03 17:17 ET


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; irrelevant; postwariraq; powell; reconstruction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: kattracks
"We didn't take on this huge burden with our coalition partners not to be able to have a significant dominating control over how it unfolds in the future," Powell told a House of Representatives subcommittee.

HOLD ON TO YOUR HATS, SPORTS FANS... POWELL IS FINALLY STARTING TO TALK LIKE AN AMERICAN !!
41 posted on 03/26/2003 2:34:15 PM PST by UncleSamUSA (the land of the free and the home of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
I hope that nobody in the Administration caves on this. The U.N. should be completely out...especially France & Russia.

Powell was saying different, but I hope he is over-ridden.

The U.N. now and forever will be irrelevant.

The United States & Britian along with the Aussies are fighting and some dying. We ("coalition of the willing") should be the ones in charge.

43 posted on 03/26/2003 2:34:41 PM PST by KriegerGeist ("In war there is no substitute for victory" General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
France weeps.

Daschle is saddened.

44 posted on 03/26/2003 2:35:04 PM PST by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Kofi has repeatedly referred to us as the belligerents, and has stated that the UN will not stand by and let the belligerents supervise the rebuilding of Iraq.

Kofi's full of bluster, but he better raise a mighty powerful army if he wants to back any of it up.

45 posted on 03/26/2003 2:35:09 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reb Raider
I am worried the British won't go along with this.

I doubt if Powell would be the spokesperson if we are not serious. It's an encouraging statement, in light of Blair's continued suggestions that the U.N. must be consulted, which are not encouraging.

I'd like to know what the U.N. plans to do with the estimated $20 billion+ is has on account from the Iraqi Oil-for-Food program, if they refuse to give it to us to administer.

Put it in a trust fund for Saddam's heirs, maybe?

46 posted on 03/26/2003 2:35:46 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
Britain reportedly wants the U.N. in charge. Hopefully, we will stand firm.
47 posted on 03/26/2003 2:35:54 PM PST by rwfromkansas (Soli Deo Gloria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Let's install a corrupt dictator and start a bloody civil war. That would accomplish the same thing as turning the country over to the UN.
48 posted on 03/26/2003 2:37:27 PM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Forgot all about that bunch.

I still stand by my comments re: Russia.
49 posted on 03/26/2003 2:38:20 PM PST by hchutch ("But tonight we get EVEN!" - Ice-T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
I'd like to know what the U.N. plans to do with the estimated $20 billion+ is has on account from the Iraqi Oil-for-Food program,

It’s slowly evaporating into wispy Swiss bank accounts as we speak.

Kofi ain’t gonna be driving no Geo Prism when he leaves office.

50 posted on 03/26/2003 2:38:25 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What I would like to see is the United States immediately withdrawing from the UN after we achieve victory in Iraq. It would be nice if all our allies followed suit. France, Germany, Russia, and China could spend the rest of their days denouncing us to Kofi Annan.

Of course when we withdraw, we will also evict :)
51 posted on 03/26/2003 2:40:31 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The coalition is the Bush administration's term for the United States, Britain and the other minor contributors to the invasion of Iraq they launched last week.

It wouldn't be a Reuters story without a sneer like this.

52 posted on 03/26/2003 2:41:03 PM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (http://c-pol.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Kewl. GoPowellGo....
53 posted on 03/26/2003 2:41:13 PM PST by eureka! (Bless our Troops and Allies.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mondonico
The world must know American adults are in charge.

Your comment is on the money:

Excellent. We should all send Annan, Chirac, Schroeder and Putin the story of the Little Red Hen (moral of the story: those who don't help make dinner, don't eat dinner).

54 posted on 03/26/2003 2:41:22 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The UN can pack up and move to France, eh ?
55 posted on 03/26/2003 2:41:41 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is fantastic. Not only does it stick it to the UN, the Iraqis have a much brighter future without their simpering beauracrats in charge.
56 posted on 03/26/2003 2:42:09 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: small voice in the wilderness
chirac cancels his drapery order. And curses George Washington all over again.

Bwahahhahahaa! I laughed so hard, the neighbors probably heard me!!!

57 posted on 03/26/2003 2:42:29 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl (America...love it or leave it. Canada is due north-Mexico is directly south...start walking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
terrific news! :)
58 posted on 03/26/2003 2:45:06 PM PST by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Hey, I wish we could do that. I have seen such hatred for us from the U.N. that I want them out of the country. I am hoping Bush gives Blair some Texas size oranges during their meeting, and hopefully the British are just as outraged by the French, Russians, and Germans to give him some autonomy here. However, I watched his Parliament going batty over needing U.N. guidance and help with the rebuilding and humanitarian effort early this morning and I just don't know how much he can take politically if he doesn't. He may want France to make an idiot of themselves again at the U.N. and we will have another circus and America is the terrorist debate that I would rather skip--
59 posted on 03/26/2003 2:45:36 PM PST by Reb Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
>>>The United States will not cede control of Iraq to the United Nations if and when it overthrows President Saddam Hussein, Secretary of State Colin Powell said on Wednesday.

There's no if in it!

The regime of the gangster Saddam is just about through.

60 posted on 03/26/2003 2:47:49 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson