Am I correct in assuming that you trust Saddam's word more than the word of a fundamentalist Christian or a Zionist Jew?
That's an unfair comparison. Honest people report bogus information all the time, and its more likely to happen if they're sympathies lie more with one side than the other. The CBN reporter may be overenthusiastic, or he's getting info from troops who aren't qualified to make the determination if they are chemicals. Hell, I'm a former artillery officer, and I couldn't tell you just from looking at a soviet round if its chemical or not.
So taking this with a grain of salt doesn't mean that you find Saddam more credible than the reporter. It's simply a recognition that the reporter may have jumped to an unwarranted conclusion.
BACK OFF JACKASS. Of course not. I'm making an obvious point that JP or CBN breaking this is better propaganda value for the Islamofascists than anything Saddam could hope for.