Got a cite for that? Homosexualilty exists in the animal kingdom, in nature. Is nature in violation of natural law?
Why can't the libertines see that no significant number of people has ever wanted to live in the fantasy land society they wish to create?
Significant number of people is not the determinant between right and wrong. And who are you to tell someone else what kind of society they should wish to create?
Last thoguht - when we legalise drugs, what will we then do about the plague of driving under the influence of these substances that will result?
Driving drunk is far more dangerous than driving stoned.
Since you are trying to be dumb and cute ... homosexuality is against the natural law because it is against the obviously intended natural use of the sexual organs, which was for sex between a man and a woman. That is why it is termed an unnatural or deviate offense.
Driving drunk is far more dangerous than driving stoned.
I offer you the example of Railway Engineer Ricky Gates and the fatal Chase, Maryland, Amtrak wreck he cased when he got himself stoend on duty, disabled the safety devices on his freight locomotive, and proceeded to operate it through several stop signals and switches into the path of an Amtrak train travelling 128 mph. Fortunately, the first car on the train was unoccupied because it was being held out for boarding passengers in Philadelphia. The Amtrak engineer and 15 people in the second car were killed instantly upon impact.
And having proved your status as an ignoramous and a dope advoate, I end the discussion with you.