Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Here's what the Supremes have to say about your "no harm, no foul" interpretation of what went on.

"It must be recognized that, whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away, he has "seized" that person. ...Moreover, it is simply fantastic to urge that such a procedure [p*17] performed in public by a policeman while the citizen stands helpless, perhaps facing a wall with his hands raised, is a "petty indignity." [n13] It is a serious intrusion upon the sanctity of the person, which may inflict great indignity and arouse strong resentment, and it is not to be undertaken lightly. [n14]" Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)

I think that this guy was couragous to stand up to the cops when they were trying to abuse and intimidate him. Obviously, he cares about his rights as a citizen. I think he really does see the big picture, that the "threat" of terrorism should not be used to justify the abuse of citizens and the trampling of their rights.

201 posted on 03/25/2003 7:56:24 PM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: Henrietta
No, no, no, no...

If he knows that the police had NO RIGHT to do this, he is FAILING as a citizen, to speak out and sue the b-stards! The police powers will only continue to encroach upon the citizens, when we turn a blind eye, cause controversy, earn a buck, and move on. He didn't stand up to the police at ALL! WALKING AWAY would have been standing up. Filing a complaint would have been standing up. Suing the police would be standing up! He is as complicit as the police in the loss of his own freedoms, because he refuses to take a stand.

Do not think for one minute that I support this reporter. As an American, I am ashamed that he refuses to follow this through, until the end.
202 posted on 03/25/2003 8:00:25 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: Henrietta
I think he really does see the big picture, that the "threat" of terrorism should not be used to justify the abuse of citizens and the trampling of their rights.

Hmmmm. For once we agree...

227 posted on 03/26/2003 9:50:21 AM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: Henrietta
"I think that this guy was couragous to stand up to the cops when they were trying to abuse and intimidate him."

I think that this guy is a jerk with a huge chip on his shoulder.

231 posted on 03/26/2003 10:43:10 AM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson