"No harm, no foul"
But I note the response you got from the poster: Yes, but only after one side illegally detained the other for an hour and a half.
See the police were wrong because this guy refused to cooperate with a reasonable request. He shows ID, he is gone, case closed. No harm no foul.
But a reasonable cop, acting on a call, has a man in custody who refuses co-operation. He plays a hunch and decides to check it out further. And some people place the blame on him.
See the problem?
In other words, the police are wrong for a minor inconvenience, which could have been avoided by the 'victim' in the first place. Yes, I believe henretta is a democrat lurker, she has to be. real Republicans make sense, like you do.