Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mabelkitty
>>Are the Shi'ites muslims? If so, why are they here and not in Iran?<<

Excellent question.

Persia (Iran) has existed for 3000 years, more or less where t is today.

"Iraq" was invented by the British Foreign Office in 1922, has no native people and no natural boundaries. They merged three Turkish provinces: Mosul (Kurds), Mesopotamia (Sunni Arabs, Chaldean Christians, Jews) and Basra (Marsh Arabs, Shiites).

Why they did this, I don't know. Why we decided that a guarantee ot the territorial integrity of "Iraq" was a good idea, I cannot fathom except as some kind of misguided multiculturalism.

170 posted on 03/25/2003 9:36:52 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
There's nothing good about the current boundaries, but it's better than the alternative--widespread re-arrangement of boundaries, leaving bloodbaths in the wake. No reason why Turkey should rule 15 million Kurds, etc. Iraq as a federal republic could work, and in a federation a new tradition of respecting minority rights may be started. (Ojala! as the Spanish say.)
238 posted on 03/25/2003 9:44:31 AM PST by maro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
The British created Iraq to create a British-owned oil company. It was most cynical reason and it turned to be the root of all of Iraq's subsequent troubles. Its been a country that has never in its modern history, had a representative system of government.
270 posted on 03/25/2003 9:48:41 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
Well, that explains the Kurd/Turk problem. Why does Greece have a dog in this fight?
314 posted on 03/25/2003 9:55:14 AM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
Why we decided that a guarantee ot the territorial integrity of "Iraq" was a good idea, I cannot fathom except as some kind of misguided multiculturalism.

Do you think it is misguided multiculturalism, or is it resigned pragmatism? When you start thinking about the ramifications of breaking the "country" up (such as it is), it boggles the imagination. The south would undoubtedly align with Iran. This would leave the center landlocked, and would essentially make Iran a "bordering neighbor" to Kuwait. It would seemingly make Iran a huge oil producer.

It would lead to the creation of a Kurdistan to the north and possibly destabilze Turkey. We might gain some short sighted gratification fom seeing Turkey suffer, but they are the only democratic Muslim state, and a NATO ally.

It probably is best to leave Iraq intact and see if it can function as some sort of federation. It ain't gonna be easy.

381 posted on 03/25/2003 10:04:03 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson