To: Mother Abigail
Let's be careful out there
To: Mother Abigail
Sent home to rest?
Either they do not really think this is SARS, or they are incompetent.
3 posted on
03/24/2003 5:16:59 PM PST by
EternalHope
(Chirac is funny, France is a joke.)
To: Mother Abigail
>Unconfirmed reports said that she had been given sick leave after taking care of a Taiwanese businessman surnamed Chin after he turned up ill after coming back from mainland China.
A computer wiz
named Bill Joy speculated
about the dangers
of systems that do
self-replication. His thoughts
did not have pleasant
conclusions. Slow and
steady wins the race. Here's an
excerpt, and the link:
"It is most of all the power of destructive self-replication in genetics, nanotechnology, and robotics (GNR) that should give us pause. Self-replication is the modus operandi of genetic engineering, which uses the machinery of the cell to replicate its designs, and the prime danger underlying gray goo in nanotechnology. Stories of run-amok robots like the Borg, replicating or mutating to escape from the ethical constraints imposed on them by their creators, are well established in our science fiction books and movies. It is even possible that self-replication may be more fundamental than we thought, and hence harder - or even impossible - to control. A recent article by Stuart Kauffman in Nature titled "Self-Replication: Even Peptides Do It" discusses the discovery that a 32-amino-acid peptide can "autocatalyse its own synthesis." We don't know how widespread this ability is, but Kauffman notes that it may hint at "a route to self-reproducing molecular systems on a basis far wider than Watson-Crick base-pairing."" [Why the future doesn't need us -- Our most powerful 21st-century technologies - robotics, genetic engineering, and nanotech - are threatening to make humans an endangered species. By Bill Joy -- WIRED, Issue 8.04 - Apr 2000]
To: Mother Abigail
U.S. Flu Deaths Up Sharply Since 1970s, Researchers Say
Wednesday, January 08, 2003
CHICAGO Influenza has surpassed AIDS
as a lethal killer and contributes to
an average 36,000 annual U.S. deaths,
largely because of a vulnerable aging
population for whom the vaccine is
often ineffective, government research shows.
The U.S. flu-related death toll surged
fourfold from 16,263 in 1976-77 to
64,684 in 1998-99, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention
reported in Wednesday's Journal of the
American Medical Association. Those
numbers average out to 16,000 more
deaths yearly than the previous
estimate of 20,000.
Health and Human Services Secretary
Tommy Thompson said the news "that
influenza may be taking an even larger
toll than we have realized"
underscores the importance of flu
shots, especially for older people.
Drug breakthroughs in the mid-1990s
helped reduce U.S. AIDS deaths from
51,000 in 1995 to about 15,000 in
2001. But the main weapon doctors have
against flu -- a vaccine -- has proven
disappointingly ineffective in the
most susceptible population: people 65
and older.
Older people are more prone to flu
complications yet only about 65
percent of them get vaccinated. The
annual shots do not protect aging
immune systems as well as they do
younger ones.
Annual flu shots have been recommended
for people 65 and older since the
1960s and for those 50 and older since
2000.
The flu death toll pales in comparison
to that of the worldwide influenza
epidemic of 1918, which killed more
than 20 million people, including
500,000 Americans.
But the new numbers frustrate public
health experts who had hoped the
development of flu vaccine about 40
years ago would have had a greater
effect.
Vaccination rates are also dismal --
about 30 percent -- for another target
group, people with high-risk
conditions such as diabetes and heart
disease, said Dr. Keiji Fukuda, a CDC
epidemiologist.
Thompson noted that flu shots are free
under Medicare and said new federal
rules should help increase vaccination
rates by allowing hospitalized
Medicare patients to get flu shots
without a doctor's order.
For the study, researchers developed a
new statistical model to create a more
accurate estimate of flu deaths using
national mortality and virus
surveillance data.
The new model shows that a more lethal
virus strain has hit in recent years,
contributing to the increase in
deaths.
But between 1976 and 1999, the number
of U.S. adults 85 and older doubled.
And the researchers found that this
age group was 16 times more likely to
die of flu-related causes than people ages 65 to 69.
Flu can progress to pneumonia and other life-threatening lung infections and can weaken elderly people, making them more vulnerable to other serious ailments, such as heart disease.
The study also found that older people are disproportionately affected by another respiratory virus previously thought to be more common in children.
The researchers estimate there are 11,000 deaths annually from respiratory syncytial virus, which can cause severe cold-like symptoms and pneumonia.
Their study confirmed that RSV is the most common cause of viral death in children under 5. But to researchers' surprise, the study found that 78 percent of RSV deaths occur in people 65 and older.
"We've known for some time that influenza and RSV have a profound impact on public health," said CDC director Dr. Julie Gerberding. "However, these data indicate that the magnitude of the problem is larger than we once thought."
Vaccines against RSV are being developed.
56 posted on
03/25/2003 9:39:43 AM PST by
oceanperch
(Support Our Troops)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson