You didn't even have a glimmer of an idea, what mellifluent meant; but, you used it and when called on it, you couldn't come up with anything other than name calling and lies.
You also called me " lazy ", for no apparent reason, called me " pooky ", made smarmy and deliberately obfuscating excuses/refutation, when caught in outright lies. All that, and you repeatedly accuse me of being off topic, when you are the one continually going off topic. You're just too full of yourself, to see how supremely silly ( not to mention boring ) a figure you are.
You want to play these games ? Then take it like an adult, when you've been chastened and rebuted; instead of being a weasel. ; ^ )
You also called me " lazy ", for no apparent reason, called me " pooky ",Earlier, you made reference to one of your "infamous typos." Typo, of course, is slang for "typographical error," and "typographical" pertains to "typography."
By your contorted parsing, you can't have a typo on the interent... and yet you clearly have and claim many.
To hold that "typography" only applies to the printing press is to hold that language is static, and that words never acquire new usages or connotations. "Linguisticwise," that's not how it works.
You want to play these games ? Then take it like an adult, when you've been chastened and rebuted; instead of being a weasel. ; ^ )I called you lazy because at #1218 you suggested that I do the research to support your mistaken contention. I called you pookie becasuse you called me "dear."
Only occasionaly, as your distorted sense of your gravitational pull in the Solar System grows tedious when encountered on a regular basis.