Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: delacoert
If whatever he was carrying was in an "envelope", then it wasn't anthrax. This is bull.

I don't know if the story's true or not, but carrying anthrax in an envelope wouldn't prove or disprove its authenticity.

True, it would expose the person carrying it to anthrax, but it may take a week or more to actually debilitate the carrier, by which time he could be expected to infect many. Considering how the Iraqi regime has total disregard for its troops' life or safety, it wouldn't be inconsistent for them to use them this way. An uneducated peasant might not even know that he was being set up, but he would certainly know that refusal to do it would mean summary execution. Not much of a choice.

269 posted on 03/22/2003 1:20:05 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: browardchad
The deliverer could also be immunized.
272 posted on 03/22/2003 1:21:09 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson