[VRWC_minion]

I heard Ritter. Talk about a wacko. When asked why Bush wanted to go after Iraq if it had no WMD he ranted that Bush wants the US to dominate the world and needs to take out any nation that might be a threat.

I don't think he understand how his posistion is contradictory. If Bush knows Iraq has no WMD then its not a threat and why in the world would Bush need to dominate Iraq if it had no WMD ?

He also said their were no scuds and unless we get the serial numbers we shouldn't believe it. He is also a omniscient because he knows there are no WMD since his own investigation.

He also never mentioned that the Iraqi people want us to liberate.

In summary, even if their were a thousand catholic nuns as eye witness to chemical weapons he would not be convinced.

[Fledermaus]

Serial numbers on the Scuds? Was he serious? Geez, maybe we can get them for jaywalking too!

[prairiebreeze]

He also never mentioned that the Iraqi people want us to liberate.

That's always the pesky little detail that they so conveniently forget.

Prairie

[Lauratealeaf]

He also never mentioned that the Iraqi people want us to liberate.

In summary, even if their were a thousand catholic nuns as eye witness to chemical weapons he would not be convinced.

Your post got me to thinking. Maybe one reason why Ritter doesn't want Iraq liberated is because he is fearful that some young females may then have the freedom to speak out about something he has done.