To: killjoy
Well of course the difference in the width of the aircraft would make it harder to knock down, but deployed in a geometric pattern which would make it hard to breakthrough without making radical course changes in relatively short distances would get some of them, particularly when you know they're coming. It seems like fairly cheap defensive hardware, and you could change the pattern of deployment rapidly and randomly.
Of course the Navy could reprogram the missiles to gain altitude upon arrival and come straight down on the target. Oh well, they'd be decorative at any rate.
To: Carl from Marietta
Well of course the difference in the width of the aircraft would make it harder to knock down, but deployed in a geometric pattern which would make it hard to breakthrough without making radical course changes in relatively short distances would get some of them, particularly when you know they're coming. It seems like fairly cheap defensive hardware, and you could change the pattern of deployment rapidly and randomly. At this point I think it falls into the deminishing returns catagory. :)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson