Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: killjoy
Well of course the difference in the width of the aircraft would make it harder to knock down, but deployed in a geometric pattern which would make it hard to breakthrough without making radical course changes in relatively short distances would get some of them, particularly when you know they're coming. It seems like fairly cheap defensive hardware, and you could change the pattern of deployment rapidly and randomly.

Of course the Navy could reprogram the missiles to gain altitude upon arrival and come straight down on the target. Oh well, they'd be decorative at any rate.
2,373 posted on 03/22/2003 11:33:49 AM PST by Carl from Marietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2322 | View Replies ]


To: Carl from Marietta
Well of course the difference in the width of the aircraft would make it harder to knock down, but deployed in a geometric pattern which would make it hard to breakthrough without making radical course changes in relatively short distances would get some of them, particularly when you know they're coming. It seems like fairly cheap defensive hardware, and you could change the pattern of deployment rapidly and randomly.

At this point I think it falls into the deminishing returns catagory. :)

2,384 posted on 03/22/2003 11:36:40 AM PST by killjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson