[jammer]

I'm not being argumentative. But to Ken, and all who agree with him totally, there are only three choices: support the action, oppose the action, or oppose the action, yet "support the troops", the latter being an example of hypocrisy. Admittedly, there is a lot of this, and we can say that Daschle, etc. "support[ing] the troops" is that much BS. They haven't, they don't, and they won't. But, don't you think there is a possiblity that there are honorable people who think the action is a strategic blunder, yet are gung-ho when the shots are fired? If not, I feel sorry for you, and us.

[HairOfTheDog]

But, don't you think there is a possiblity that there are honorable people who think the action is a strategic blunder, yet are gung-ho when the shots are fired? If not, I feel sorry for you, and us.

Not sure anything I have said would be contrary to this. That is not what he is saying, and it is not what I have said.

Of course there are. There are people who by nature don't like war or aren't predisposed to support Bush. I have a couple of mostly Liberal friends in this category. They aren't out on the streets protesting the war and pretending they are not hurting the troops.